Dilapidation surveys are common in many other countries. However, there are some differences in the approach to these surveys in the UK and Ireland. Know the differences in dilapidation surveys around the world.
The UK and Ireland Approach to Dilapidation Surveys
In the UK and Ireland, dilapidation surveys are primarily focused on commercial properties. They are usually conducted towards the end of a lease in order to identify any repairs or maintenance that are the responsibility of the tenant. These surveys are typically carried out by a surveyor appointed by the landlord or the tenant.
One key difference in the UK and Ireland approach to dilapidation surveys is the use of a specific set of guidelines known as the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) guidelines. These guidelines provide a standard framework for conducting dilapidation surveys and ensure consistency in the surveyors’ approach. The RICS guidelines cover a range of topics, including the scope of the survey, the condition of the property, and the repair obligations of the tenant.
Dilapsolutions, Providing Exemplary Dilapidation Surveys in the UK and Ireland
Dilapsolutions is a team of chartered surveyors, providing niche solutions to help resolve commercial dilapidation disputes. Dilapidation surveys are part of this, and the firm is perhaps the best example of how these surveys are done in the UK and Ireland.
Dilapidation surveys, as done in the UK and Ireland, is an assessment of the real condition of a property. it is a way to maximise property value, and prevent disputes.
How the Rest of the World Approaches Dilapidation Surveys
The approach to dilapidation surveys vary in other parts of the world. For example, in the United States, dilapidation surveys are more commonly known as property condition assessments. They are usually carried out as part of a due diligence process when buying or selling commercial properties. Property condition assessments in the US are more focused on identifying any issues that may affect the value of the property, instead of the repair obligations of the tenant.
In Australia, dilapidation surveys may be required by law. For instance, in Victoria, Australia, dilapidation surveys are requisite before construction work can begin on a neighboring property to ensure that any damage caused by the construction work can be identified and attributed to the responsible party.
In other parts of the world, dilapidation surveys may be less common or may be conducted in a less formal way. In some countries in Asia and Africa, for instance, dilapidation surveys may be carried out by local officials or community members rather than by professional surveyors.
Pros and Cons of Different Approaches to Dilapidation Surveys
There are advantages and disadvantages to the different approaches to dilapidation surveys across the world. In the UK and Ireland, the use of standardized guidelines ensures consistency and clarity in the approach taken by surveyors. However, the focus on the repair obligations of the tenant may lead to landlord vs tenant disputes over the cost and necessity of repairs.
In the US, property condition assessments provide a more comprehensive view of the condition of the property, which can be beneficial for both buyers and sellers. However, the lack of a standardized approach can lead to inconsistencies in the assessments carried out by different surveyors.
In countries where dilapidation surveys are required by law, such as Australia, this can help to ensure that properties are properly maintained and that damages are repaired promptly. However, the requirement for these surveys may also add to the overall cost of property ownership. It can also be seen as an additional regulatory burden.
Remember…
In general, a dilapidation survey is a good thing whether or not it is a legal or contractual requirement. The key is to ensure that the surveys are carried out by qualified professionals who will provide a clear, accurate and standardized assessment of the condition of the property.